Based on your critical reading of these two short chapters, which view (i.e. the environment shapes human nature/character or humans shape the environment) do you believe is more prominent or persuasive? Say why.
The civilization of Ancient Greece lasted for maybe 500 years or more. The Roman Empire lasted 1000 years. Ultimately, however, despite their respective cultural, economic, political and military achievements, neither civilization lasted forever. If the success of a civilization is marked by expansion -- in terms of population and territory -- and exploitation -- of land and resources -- does this mean, in your opinion, that ALL civilizations are inevitably doomed to eventual collapse? Briefly explain your answer.