Avery purchased a refrigerator from a retail store. The written contact stated that the refrigerator was sold "as is" and that the warranty of merchantability and all warranties of fitness were exculded. This was stated in large capital letters printed just above the line on which Avery signed her name. The refrigerator worked properly for a few weeks and then stopped. The store refused to do anything about it because of the exclusion of the warranties made by the contract. Avery claimed that this exclusion was not binding because it was unconscionable. Was Avery correct? [ Avery v. Aladdin Products Div., Nat'l Service Industires , Inc., 196 S.E.2nd 357 (Ga.App.)]