Assess the critical thinking overall plausibility of claim


Assignment: Argument Mapping

Write a four to five (4 to 5) page paper in which you:

1.Create an argument map based on the influence diagram presented in Case 1.3 and complete all the criteria provided in the exercise, beginning with this claim: "The U.S. should return to the 55- mph speed limit in order to conserve fuel and save lives."

2.Include in the map as many warrants, backings, objections, and rebuttals as possible.

3.Assume that the original qualifier was certainly; indicate whether the qualifier changes as we move from a simple, static, uncontested argument to a complex, dynamic and contested argument.

4.Apply the argument mapping procedures presented to analyze the pros and cons (or strengths and weaknesses) of the recommendations that the United States should not intervene in the Balkans.

5.Write a one (1) page analysis that uses critical thinking to assess the overall plausibility of the claim: "The conflict in Bosnia is somebody else's trouble. The U.S. should not intervene militarily."

6.Complete an argument map to illustrate your analysis.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

•Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Other Subject: Assess the critical thinking overall plausibility of claim
Reference No:- TGS01989698

Now Priced at $45 (50% Discount)

Recommended (96%)

Rated (4.8/5)