Prepare an article suitable for publication in a "letters to the editor" section of a print or online journal, rebutting the position in the National Science Foundation article (see "Science and Engineering Indicators 2002: Science and Technology: Science Fiction and Pseudoscience" in this week's resources), that CAM is pseudoscience. Be sure to point out any logical fallacies in the article, and present research based evidence, using the material in the book as well as at least five research articles published in peer reviewed journals in the past three years to support your argument.
WHY CAM IS NOT A PSEUDOSCIENCE!!! NOT SUPPORTING A PSEUDOSCIENCE!!!