Arguing that winning the race was the consideration given


Preexisting Duty. Ben hired Lewis to drive his racing car in a race. Tuan, a friend of Lewis, promised to pay Lewis $3,000 if he won the race. Lewis won the race, but Tuan refused to pay the $3,000. Tuan contended that no legally binding contract had been formed because he had received no consideration from Lewis for his promise to pay. Lewis sued Tuan for breach of contract, arguing that winning the race was the consideration given in exchange for Tuan's promise to pay. What rule of law discussed in this chapter supports Tuan's claim? Explain.

Past Consideration. Daniel, a recent college graduate, is on his way home for the Christmas holidays from his new job. He gets caught in a snowstorm and is taken in by an elderly couple who provide him with food and shelter. After the snowplows have cleared the road, Daniel pro-ceeds home. Daniel's father, Fred, is most appreciative of the elderly couple's action and in a letter promises to pay them $500. The couple, in need of funds, accept Fred's offer. Then, because of a dispute with Daniel, Fred refuses to pay the couple the $500. Discuss whether the couple can hold Fred liable in contract for the services rendered to Daniel.

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Dissertation: Arguing that winning the race was the consideration given
Reference No:- TGS02423938

Now Priced at $10 (50% Discount)

Recommended (96%)

Rated (4.8/5)