Question: Are any of the four traditional ethical theories we examined-i.e., consequence-based, duty based, contract-based, and character-based-adequate to handle moral issues that arise as a result of cybertechnology? If not, is an alternative kind of ethical theory needed, as some have argued (e.g., Adam 2008)? Or can a comprehensive, integrated theory, such as the one proposed by James Moor (i.e., his theory of "just consequentialism") be used successfully to resolve moral issues involving cyber technology?