Problem
Esi published in the New Crusading Guide that anyone who has cancer and who eats the head of a lizard but fails to be cured of his/her cancer is entitled to a paid round trip to the United States for cancer treatment, with the cost of treatment to be borne by her, Esi. Marcus had cancer, saw the advert in the New Crusading Guide, ate the head of a lizard, but his cancer was never cured. Fifty other people who had cancer and who read the advert in the Daily Guide each ate the head of a lizard but failed to have their cancers cured. Nancy who had cancer, not one of the fifties, never saw this advert or public ation, ate the head of a lizard but her cancer too failed to cure.
1. Nancy who is your cousin, and knows you studied Legal Environment of Business has consulted you to find out if she is entitled to this trip to the United States to have her cancer treated at the expense of Esi. Is Nancy entitled?
2. Is Marcus entitled to this trip to the United States to have his cancer treated at the expense of Esi?
3. Are all the fifty other people who had cancer and who ate the head of a lizard but failed to have theircancers cured, entitled to the trip and the treatment at the expense of Esi?