Assignment Task: It is a discussion response read it and sends me the response
My personal ethical philosophy is based on where I am and what can be the benefit to get out of the actual position. This way of seeing things matches better with the utilitarian ethical theory that suggests that the moral rules are designed to produce great happiness for everyone (BBC, 2014). From my student position, the great happiness should be for the other students. One decision that can bring happiness to the substantial number of people in the student world can be tuition free for all students. This will bring happiness to everyone in the way that all the students at school can go without stressing over the tuition. Even those who want to go to school but must use the loan will also be happy. Thus, everyone committing to school will complete the program of their choice. The one who will not benefit from this decision will be the government, but it is the government's job to make sure that the population is educated. Because a well-educated population ensures the best quality of life and lead the population to better understand the governments politic. Where I will not agree with this decision would be the fact that some students can be at risk of precarity because they were having extra money from the tuition payment. After paying for the tuition and other fees, the students use to receive some cash for books and other expenses, if there is no more of that money, some students would have to work to be able to afford their rent, transportation, and food.
I chose this moral philosophy over the others because this can help people to achieve something and be the better him or her in life. This moral decision should help people get away from the veil of ignorance which is defined by Huang et al. (2019) as a moral reasoning device designed to promote impartial decision making by denying decision makers access to potentially biasing information about who will benefit most or leased from the available options. The veil of ignorance does not allow anyone to respect the social contract. Applying the veil of ignorance theory to John Doe's case will be the explanative session of the veil of ignorance theory, because the bias here is the fact that John Doe believes that he is poor, and this situation can justify the use of that application to get free books against his religious moral ethics.