Discussion:
Legal Definitions and the Courts: Insanity Defense
In many ways, the legal definitions used by forensic psychology professionals are a reminder that the court system exists separate from the field of forensic psychology. Although the general public may use the term insanity to denote abnormal psychological functioning, it is actually not a psychological term but, instead, a legal term with a very specific legal definition. This week's application familiarizes you with two different definitions of the legal term of insanity and how, depending on which one is used, different court rulings may result. You also explore how legal definitions impact the role of the forensic psychologyprofessional in general and in the courts.
Questions:
1. Compare these two definitions and consider the relevance of the similarities and differences of each. Think about the impact the legal definition of insanity has on the role of the forensic psychology professional in general and in the courts.
2. Analyze and compare (similarities and differences) the two definitions of insanity you reviewed.
3. Analyze and evaluate the relevance and importance of legal definitions to the forensic psychology professional. Justify your response by using the literature.
4. Analyze and explain the impact of legal definitions on forensic psychology professionals.
5. Analyze and explain the impact of legal definitions on the role of forensic psychology professionals in the courts.
6. Explain any insights or conclusions you came to based on your comparison of the two definitions of insanity you reviewed.