Analyze and evaluate the methodology of both studies


Discussion Post: Empirical Reasoning

Introduction

As the text points out, causal reasoning is used in clinical studies. As a professional in the health field, you will undoubtedly be referring to cause/effect studies for the rest of your professional life. In this discussion, you are asked to expand and deepen your understanding of clinical studies.

In 1999, a study on the causes of myopia appeared in the prestigious journal Nature (Quinn). The study received wide-spread publicity in leading newspapers, such as the New York Times, and on television outlets, such as CBS and CNN. Within a year, another article in Nature followed up the 1999 study (Zadnik et al., 2000). The studies had dramatically different findings.

Instructions

Using what you have learned from the text, as well as any other sources you may find useful (including the website in the Required Resources), analyze and evaluate the methodology of both studies and how methodology affected the differences in how the studies were reported.

The response must include a reference list. Using one-inch margins, double-space, Times New Roman 12 pnt font and APA style of writing and citations.

Reference

• Article: Myopia and Ambient Lighting at Night.
• Article: Myopia and Ambient Night-Time Lighting.
• Website: What Are Clinical Trials and Studies?

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Other Subject: Analyze and evaluate the methodology of both studies
Reference No:- TGS03139827

Now Priced at $20 (50% Discount)

Recommended (95%)

Rated (4.7/5)