Although historians might disagree about historical events in films, does this discredit historical films if the audience comes away with deeper emotions, feelings and understanding, as well as the devastation and affect of that event in history? Is Hollywood's job to tell the truth or to entertain, inform, and keep audiences interested and engaged in the film? Can directors and filmmakers take a certain point of view to explore an era in history, use their creativity and visual images, distort some past truths, relate some truths and give an understanding and account of history?