Alda argues that the covenant restricts only the type of


Alda and Mattingly are residents of Unit I of Chimney Hills Subdivision. The lots owned by Alda and Mattingly are subject to the following restrictive covenant: ‘‘Lots shall be for single-family residence purposes only.'' Alda intends to convert her carport into a beauty shop, and Mattingly brings suit against Alda to enjoin her from doing so.

Alda argues that the covenant restricts only the type of building that can be constructed, not the incidental use to which residential structures are put. Will Alda be able to operate a beauty shop on the property? Why or why not?

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Business Law and Ethics: Alda argues that the covenant restricts only the type of
Reference No:- TGS02187669

Expected delivery within 24 Hours