1. Anselm argues for the view . . .
A. that God is merely an idea.
B. that God does not exist.
C. that God exists in reality.
D. None of the above
2. Anselm argues for the view that God is by nature . . .
A. a contingent being.
B. a greatest possible contingent being.
C. a necessary being.
D. all of the above.
E. None of the above
3. Aquinas argues for the view that . . .
A. anything in motion requires a cause.
B. only irregular motion requires a cause.
C. motion can occur without a cause.
D. All of the above
E. None of the above
4. Aquinas argues for the view that a contingent being is . . .
A. a being whose nonexistence is impossible.
B. a being whose existence is caused by itself.
C. a being whose nonexistence is possible.
D. all of the above
5. Moreland argues for . . .
A. an infinite number of universes.
B. a single atheistic universe on the basis of chance.
C. God's existence based on the irreducible and personal nature of consciousness.
D. None of the above
6. Moreland argues for . . .
A. a theory of consciousness consistent with atheistic physicalism.
B. a theory of consciousness consistent with agnosticism.
C. a theory of consciousness consistent with deism.
D. a theory of consciousness consistent with theism.
E. None of the above
7. Moreland argues for the view . . .
A. that atheistic physicalism can provide a personal explanation of consciousness.
B. that atheistic physicalism cannot provide a personal explanation of consciousness, whereas theism can.
C. All of the above
D. None of the above
8. Moreland argues for the view that a personal explanation . . .
A. consists entirely in providing a mechanistic explanation.
B. consists entirely in providing a neural explanation.
C. consists in providing no explanation because persons are not real.
D. All of the above
E. None of the above