1. What are Washington's thoughts on the state of the Constitution (living vs. static)? What are his concerns? Are they valid?
2. The ultimate issue here is how should judges and lawmakers interpret its words?
3. Should they try to discern "the original intent" of the Founding Fathers?
4. Should they look to the strict meaning of the words that appear within the four corners of the document and no futher?
5. Should only the spirit of the Constitution be considered, treating it as a "living document" that evolves with changing times and societal mores?