1. What are the facts of this case? Who are the parties to the lawsuit?
2. How was this case resolved? Why do you think the parties agreed to resolve the case in this way?
3. What is the Federal False Claims Act? Why was it enacted? How does it apply to this case? In general, who stands to gain from the use of this act? What are the potential awards to plaintiffs?
4. What is unusual about the plaintiff in this case? How was the Justice Department involved? 5. The article states Celgene did not admit liability? Why would a company settle a lawsuit if it is not liable? What benefits could a company derive by settling, but not admitting liability?