--%>

When is a good taken as scarce, explain

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding scarcity in economics generally?

A good is taken as scarce when people: (w) lack the funds required to make sure their survival. (x) requirement to consume large amounts of this. (y) need more of this than the amounts available when this were free. (z) can have more and more they need without paying for this.

Pleases friends help me for the given problem as in above.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : When are relative prices serving as

    The behavior on the given list most consistent along with relative prices serving like a rationing device, and not mainly as incentives, would be as: (i) Marcia, a status-seeking social climber that turning down requests of Wayne for dates after seeing small numbers u

  • Q : Capitalism as a decentralized decision

    The idea that a virtue of the capitalism is its decentralized decision making appeared when: (i) Social philosophers looked for the alternatives to feudal kings as the economic regulators. (ii) Russian imperialism fostered anti-communist sentiment fol

  • Q : Determine when a good is scarce A good

    A good is scarce when: (1) individuals are willing to pay a positive price for more of this. (2) this is socially but not individually beneficial. (3) individuals are willing to pay to have this not produced. (4) more is obtainable at

  • Q : Spending money for enhancement in

    Choosing NOT to spend the additional money required to enhance the safety of a dangerous traffic intersection is an illustration of: (v) macroeconomic policy decisions. (w) positive economics. (x) how society assigns prices to human lives. (y) economic inefficiency. (

  • Q : Illustrates the problem of Productive

    At present, at Bob's Candle shop, Arjuna and Krishna share the jobs of making molds and making candles. Nonetheless, while Arjuna is best at making molds and Krishna is much better at creating the candles, then: (a) Bob’s shop is experiencing allocative although

  • Q : Illustrates a case of Scarcity and

    Every decision involves opportunity costs due to the fundamental facts which underpin: (i) limits to human reason. (ii) production technology. (iii) limits to human wants. (iv) demand and supply analysis. (v) scarcity.

    Q : Example of Normative Economics with no

    A statement which needs no value judgments would be which an optimal distribution of goods is: (w) invariably best for society. (x) better for society than any non-optimal distribution of goods. (y) better for society only when this conforms to the will of the majorit

  • Q : Punishment to criminals devoid of

    The early philosopher who argued about criminals must be punished proportionally to the harm completed to society, but without consideration of remorse, intent or motive was: (1) John Stuart Mill. (2) Edwin Chadwick. (3) Jeremy Bentham. (4) Adam Smith. (5) Aristotle.<

  • Q : Theory of independence in Adam Smith era

    The Age of Enlightenment shown increased reliance upon scientific methodology and logic like mechanisms for ascertaining fact, and a growing belief which hierarchical authority lacks a monopoly upon purpose and wisdom. That school of thought set the stage for these do

  • Q : Determination of opportunity cost of

    The opportunity cost of any type of decision is measured through the: (w) market price of career and education opportunities. (x) value of the worst optional choice sacrificed. (y) market price of the resources used in production. (z) value of the best optional choice