--%>

When is a good taken as scarce, explain

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding scarcity in economics generally?

A good is taken as scarce when people: (w) lack the funds required to make sure their survival. (x) requirement to consume large amounts of this. (y) need more of this than the amounts available when this were free. (z) can have more and more they need without paying for this.

Pleases friends help me for the given problem as in above.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Examples of scientifically positive

    Illustrations of scientifically positive statements would comprise the assertion that: (i) executing jaywalkers and atheists will enhance the morality of average Americans. (ii) racial prejudice and violent criminal acts are symptoms of dysfunctional

  • Q : Production-possibility curve of a

    By using a curve analogous to the production-possibility curve, choices among government policy objectives could be exhibited by: (1) Moving all along the curve. (2) Shifting the curve down. (3) Shifting the curve up. (4) Comparing a point beneath the curve with one a

  • Q : Hypothesis included by normative

    Please help me to solve the problem of hypothesis in normative statements in normative economics that is given below: Normative statements would consist of the hypothesis which: (v) Abuse of alcohol lowers GPAs. (w

  • Q : Example of Normative Macroeconomics

    To say that high joblessness rates in this prosperous country are a national disgrace would be an illustration of a: (w) normative macroeconomic statement. (x) positive macroeconomic statement. (y) positive microeconomic statement. (z) normative microeconomic statemen

  • Q : What would be contained in fundamental

    Fundamental economic questions consist of: (w) what, for whom and how. (x) where, how and when. (y) when, how and what. (z) how many, how much and what color,. Hey friends please give your opinion for the problem o

  • Q : Requirement of government transaction

    A federal regulation needing all government transaction to be based upon ideal information would be: (v) The surest way to create best decisions. (w) Consistent along with the ideals of Occam's razor. (x) Impossible since no computer could handle which much informatio

  • Q : Illustration of Economic Reasoning by

    Occam’s razor refers to the idea which while evaluating a theory: (1) good theory describes the phenomenon as simply as possible, but not moreso. (2) complexity is obvious to make sure that correct answers are reached. (3) conformity along with

  • Q : What does an unessential complicated

    Unessential complicated theories violate: (w) common sense. (x) the principle of nonsatiety. (y) the laws of demand and supply. (z) Occam's razor. Please gues I really need one good answer from the above options.

  • Q : Economist-Conclusion for redistribution

    I want a good answer on the topic of normative economics. Please give me your opinion that if wealth and income both were redistributed by the richest one to the poorest five percent of the population, conclusion of an economist would be that: (w) soc

  • Q : Give an example of Production in

    By using knowledge and/or technology to apply energy to change materials, thereby making the materials more precious is: (w) production. (x) demand. (y) a total cure for scarcity. (z) economically profitable. Can someone clarify/he