--%>

Opportunity or alternative costs when marrying lover

Can two ever live as inexpensively as one? What is the opportunity or alternative costs when marrying someone you love?

E

Expert

Verified

Within an economic sense, there two can never live as cheaply as one due to the opportunity costs involved. This costs (i.e., the value of the best alternative surrendered while a choice is made  being particular) of marrying someone you love take in not being capable to do what you desire to do while you desire to do this, this is, giving up your freedom, that encompasses several things  both emotional and physical. It is true for both partners, obviously.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : When is Scarcity a problem become

    Scarcity is a problem for: (w) poor countries merely. (x) individuals only when they are poor. (y) capitalists, but not socialists. (z) all people and countries, rich and poor alike. Can someone explain/help me wit

  • Q : Explain TANSTAAFL TANSTAAFL is an

    TANSTAAFL is an acronym suggestive of that: (1) Tax agents never observe the awful influences from levies. (2) Tenants and needy must take all assets by landlords. (3) There ain't no all things like a free lunch. (4) Temperance and non satiety togethe

  • Q : Define the positive economics Please

    Please guys help me to solve out this problem that positive economics, which: (w) is accepted like true through all economists. (x) is less technical than normative economics. (y) involves statements which, when false, could be proven false. (z) addre

  • Q : Determine the essence of positive

    The essence of positive economic statements is which they: (1) should be correct, or they turn into normative statements. (2) yield predictions which can be tested for validity. (3) clearly resolve ethical or moral matters. (4) focus upon cheerful in

  • Q : Issues of normative economic policy

    Economic policy matters are usually: (w) simply resolved by positive analysis alone. (x) normative, but workable solutions based on positive analysis. (y) either strictly macroeconomic, or strictly microeconomic. (z) better resolved using common sense

  • Q : Standard step to make a new economic

    A standard step while making a new economic theory is to: (w) properly blend normative and positive perspectives. (x) physically test this in an economics laboratory. (y) see when this predicts behavior in a consistent way. (z) make sure that this con

  • Q : Illustration of a positive scientific

    An illustration of a positive scientific statement would be which college graduates who: (i) create higher incomes than high school drop outs deserve that higher income. (ii) charge victims of hurricanes as well as other natural disasters outrageous prices must be sho

  • Q : Determine broad distributive economics

    Economy-broad efficiency: (w) may only be got in a command economy. (x) is classically the most significant goal of public policies. (y) has little to do along with price or market conditions. (z) needs that additional gains to anyone entails losses t

  • Q : Requirement of technically efficient

    I need a good answer on the topic of Economic problems. Please give me your suggestion that for production to be technically efficient needs that the: (i) Maximum benefits are acquired at the highest possible cost. (ii) Opportunity costs of production

  • Q : Perceptions about equity and need

    Government often bases decisions regarding distributions of income and output on: (i) unemployment and Inflation. (ii) Positive economic theories. (iii) Perceptions regarding equity and need. (iv) Market demands and supplies. Can s