--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Opportunity or alternative costs when marrying lover

Can two ever live as inexpensively as one? What is the opportunity or alternative costs when marrying someone you love?

E

Expert

Verified

Within an economic sense, there two can never live as cheaply as one due to the opportunity costs involved. This costs (i.e., the value of the best alternative surrendered while a choice is made  being particular) of marrying someone you love take in not being capable to do what you desire to do while you desire to do this, this is, giving up your freedom, that encompasses several things  both emotional and physical. It is true for both partners, obviously.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Example of Normative Economic Goals

    Please help me to solve the problem of Normative Economic Goals that is given below: Almost everybody in the world would favor a normative economic aim that people all over must have: (i) high standards of living.

    		•
  • Q : Most dealing of normative economic

    Normative economic statements deal mainly along with: (w) the way things should be. (x) production possibilities frontier analysis. (y) facts in place of theories. (z) how to measure economic variables. Please choo

    		•
  • Q : When is Self-interest evident How can I

    How can I solve my following problem? Please suggest me the correct answer. Explain reason Self interest is evident while: (i) A mugger utilizes a $1 bullet upon his victim to take $100 by his wallet. (ii) Helen cr

    		•
  • Q : Payments to entrepreneurs in

    The payments to entrepreneurs are called as: (i) Profits increasing from bearing risk and uncertainty, innovating new products and organizing production as well as processes. (ii) Rental payments by extensive land holdings. (iii) Interest through loaning money. (iv) I

    		•
  • Q : Majority worse off and minority better

    When an economic change makes a huge majority of the population worse off and a minute minority better off, the alteration is: (w) good for society because it made some people better off. (x) bad for society since only a few people ar

    		•
  • Q : Problem regarding the distributive

    Ted and Willy are eating lunch. Ted has a Snowball and Willy a Ding Dong for dessert. Strongly prefer both Ding Dongs. A required trade of Willy's Ding-Dong for Ted's Snowball would be likely to enhance: (w) distributive efficiency as Fred is better off. (x) allocativ

    		•
  • Q : Problem on private property rights and

    I have a problem in economics on private property rights and laissez faire. Please help me in the following question. The basics of pure capitalism comprise: (i) Social ownership of all non-human resources. (ii) Strong two party electoral system. (iii

    		•
  • Q : Economic questions incapability of

    Economic questions incapable of scientific verification like to correctness or falsity, as like why, how and when to prosecute and execute alleged murderers, or to whom income must be again distributed, fall in the category of: (1) positive economics.

    		•
  • Q : Bad motives make wrong decisions Which

    Which economic philosopher would have been most probably to have asserted which people do not have bad motives while they make wrong decisions; quite, they make bad computations? (w) Thomas Malthus. (x) Sir Edwin Chadwick. (y) Nassau Senior. (z) Jeremy Bentham. <

    		•
  • Q : Determine when economic efficiency is

    Economic efficiency is most clearly improved while: (i) a new Wal-Mart opens in a rural community. (ii) less-developed countries grow quicker than more developed countries. (iii) taxes are composed in accord along with the principle of progressivity. (iv) India increa

    		•