--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Explain Tachyon paradox

Tachyon paradox: The argument explaining that tachyons (should they subsist, of course) can’t carry an electric charge. For an imaginary-massed particle travelling faster than c, less energy the tachyon has, the faster it travels, till at zero energy the tachyon is travelling with unlimited velocity, or is transcendent. Now a charged tachyon at a specified (non-infinite) speed will be travelling faster than light in its own medium, and must emit Cherenkov radiation. The loss of this energy will obviously decrease the energy of the tachyon that will make it go faster, resultant in a runaway reaction where some charged tachyon will rapidly race off to the transcendence.

Though the above argument outcomes in a curious end, the meat of the tachyon paradox is this: In relativity, the transcendence of the tachyon is frame-dependent. That is, even as a tachyon may emerge to be transcendent in one frame, it would emerge to others to still have non-zero energy. However in this situation we have a condition where in one frame it would encompass come to zero energy and would stop emitting the Cherenkov radiation; however in the other frame it would still contain energy left and must be emitting Cherenkov radiation on its way to the transcendence. As they can’t both be true, by the relativistic arguments, tachyons can’t be charged.

This argument obviously does not make any account of the quantum mechanical treatments of tachyons that complicate the circumstances a huge deal.

   Related Questions in Physics

  • Q : Explain Curie-Weiss law Curie-Weiss law

    Curie-Weiss law (P. Curie, P.-E. Weiss): A more broad form of Curie's law that states that the susceptibility, khi, of a paramagnetic substance is associated to its thermodynamic temperature T by the equation:

    Q : Explain BCS theory BCS theory -  The

    BCS theory - The theory put forth to elucidate both superconductivity and super fluidity. This suggests that in the superconducting (or super fluid) state electrons form Cooper pairs, where two electrons proceed as a single unit. This takes a non

    		•
  • Q : Define Planck constant Planck constant

    Planck constant: h: The basic constant equivalent to the ratio of the energy of a quantum of energy to its frequency. This is the quantum of action. This has the value 6.626 196 x 10-34 J s.

    		•
  • Q : What is Hooke law Hooke's law (R.

    Hooke's law (R. Hooke): The stress exerted to any solid is proportional to the strain it generates within the elastic limit for that solid. The constant of that proportionality is the Young modulus of elasticity for that material.

    		•
  • Q : Define Atwood's machine Atwood's

    Atwood's machine: The weight-and-pulley system devised to compute the acceleration due to gravity at Earth's surface by computing the total acceleration of a set of weights of identified mass about a frictionless pulley.

    		•
  • Q : Explain Coulombs law Coulomb's law (C.

    Coulomb's law (C. de Coulomb): The basic law for electrostatics, equivalent to Newton's law of universal gravitation. It defines that the force between two point charges is proportional to the arithmetical product of their respective

    		•
  • Q : Define Newton meter What do you mean by

    What do you mean by the term Newton meter? Explain briefly?

    		•
  • Q : Define Noether theorem Noether theorem

    Noether theorem (Noether): A theorem that explains that symmetries are what gives rise to conserved quantities. For example, the translational symmetry (that is the fact that the laws of physics work the same in all positions) gives r

    		•
  • Q : Explain Newtons law of universal

    Newton's law of universal gravitation (Sir I. Newton): Two bodies exert a pull on each other with equivalent and opposite forces; the magnitude of this force is proportional to the product result of the two masses and is too proportional to the invers

    		•
  • Q : Define Machs principle Mach's principle

    Mach's principle (E. Mach; c. 1870): The inertia of any specific particle or particles of matter is attributable to the interaction among that piece of matter and the rest of the world. Therefore, a body in isolation would contain no inertia.

    		•