--%>

Different Views of Organizational Behavior Learning

Much of the literature of this learning, seems to be following in the tradition of learning theories and taking a psychological or individual perspective on the phenomenon. There is a debate about whether or not organizations can learn and many just take the approach that organizational learning is the sum total of the individual learning occurring in the workplace. What would happen if our focus shifted to one that is more anthropological and, therefore, focused on group learning? What if there was a shift from seeing learning as just cognitive to seeing it as occurring when groups try to make sense out of their world? As a result of this new view of organizational learning what would be some of the necessary shifts in attitudes, beliefs and practices? Why would companies want to become learning organizations?

It seems difficult to shift our view of learning to something groups do and that it is a natural part of our day-to-day activity. Many educators and theorists do not seem able to hear own contradictions. James E. Russell, dean emeritus, teachers college, Columbia university states:

It cannot be pointed out too often that all education is self-education. Teachers may help define procedure, collect equipment, indicate the most propitious routes, but the climber must use his own head and legs if he would reach the mountaintop........ The best method of teaching adults yet hit upon is undoubtedly group discussion.

The group approach to learning is very compatible with humanistic learning but even Carl Rogers in his book "freedom to learn" does not directly address group learning and group tasks. There is a reference to a "jigsaw approach" that assigns each student a piece that becomes part of a total project. This seems to fall short of what might be possible of we explore group learning as something different from the accumulation of individual learning what will happen of workers move from cooperation, helping someone when asked, to collaboration, doing real work together.

 

   Related Questions in Biology

  • Q : EGO Force of Freudian Theory -

    The ego comes into being because or the limitations of the id in dealing with the real world. Through learning and experience, the ego develops the individual's capabilities of realistic thinking and ability to deal appropriately with his environment. It operates on what is called the reality pri

  • Q : When ASO test comes positive Whenever

    Whenever ASO test comes positive, than what would be the solution? Answer: I would like to do repeat test; if it comes again positive then I will do ASO Titre.   

  • Q : Main manifestations of leishmaniasis

    Write down the main manifestations of the leishmaniasis?

  • Q : Left and right cerebral hemisphere How

    How it is structurally described that the motor activity of left side of the body is controlled by right cerebral hemisphere and motor activity of right side of the body is generally controlled by the left cerebral hemisphere?

  • Q : Assumptions for perfectly competitive

    Normal 0 false false

  • Q : What is xaxim What is meant by the

    What is meant by the xaxim?

  • Q : Synaptic transmission between neurons

    How the synaptic transmission between the neurons occurs?

  • Q : Amnion taken as an adaptation to

    Why can the amnion also be taken as an adaptation to terrestrial life?

  • Q : What is Workforce Management Workforce

    Workforce Management: It is an integrated set of processes, which an institution uses to optimize the productivity of its employees on the particular, departmental, and entity-broad levels. Within a corporation, organization, or government entity, WFM

  • Q : Define Mass Merchandising Mass

    Mass Merchandising: A practice in which a large group of individuals, as a group of employees, all assure with similar company, and remit premiums into a lump sum. Plan for insure particular members of a group, as employees of firms or members of labo