--%>

Computers playing games

How Computers playing games can be categorized according to different dimensions?

E

Expert

Verified

Computers playing games:

Competing against each other in the form of a game is nothing new. Egyptians and Chinese have archived games which date back to far before the year zero. Games can be categorized according to different dimensions. Three examples are:

(1) the number of players,

(2) whether chance is involved, and

(3) how many information a player has.

With the upcoming of computers human beings were tempted to let the computer play those games. The reason why scientists are interested in research on board games is that the rules of games are mostly exact and well defined which makes it easy to translate them to a program that is suitable for a computer to run (Van den Herik, 1983). The research in board games obtained a huge impulse in 1944 when Von Neumann republished his article about the minimax algorithm (Von Neumann, 1928) together with Morgenstern in the book “Theory of Games and Economic Behavior” (Von Neumann and Morgenstern, 1944). These ideas were picked up by Shannon (1950) and Turing (1953) who tried to let a computer play Chess as intelligently as possible. Since then much research is performed on new methods, on a variety of games (Murray, 1952) and on other problems to make the computer a worthy opponent for the human player (Schaeffer and Van den Herik, 2002). One field in this area of research are the board games which have full information and are played by two persons. Chess is the classical example of this kind of a game and a great deal of effort has been devoted in the past to the construction of a good chess player. The most pregnant success so far in this area was the result when Deep Blue achieved to win against world chess champion Garry Kasparov (Newborn, 1996).

   Related Questions in Basic Statistics

  • Q : Program Evaluation and Review

    Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) A) Developed by US Navy and a consulting firm in 1958 for the Polaris submarine project. B) Technique as for CPM method, but acti

  • Q : Probability how can i calculate

    how can i calculate cumulative probabilities of survival

  • Q : MANOVA and Reflection Activity

    Activity 10:   MANOVA and Reflection   4Comparison of Multiple Outcome Variables This activity introduces you to a very common technique - MANOVA. MANOVA is simply an extension of an ANOV

  • Q : Assumptions in Queuing system

    Assumptions in Queuing system: • Flow balance implies that the number of arrivals in an observation period is equal to the

  • Q : Principles of data analysis For the

    For the data analysis project, you will address some questions that interest you with the statistical methodology we are learning in class. You choose the questions; you decide how to collect data; you do the analyses. The questions can address almost any topic,

  • Q : What is Interactive Response Time Law

    Interactive Response Time Law: • R = (L/X) - Z• Applies to closed systems.• Z is the think time. The time elapsed since&nb

  • Q : Data Description 1. If the mean number

    1. If the mean number of hours of television watched by teenagers per week is 12 with a standard deviation of 2 hours, what proportion of teenagers watch 16 to 18 hours of TV a week? (Assume a normal distribution.) A. 2.1% B. 4.5% C. 0.3% D. 4.2% 2. The probability of an offender having a s

  • Q : OIL I need to product when oil will

    I need to product when oil will finish time (by years) for 6 countries if the keep their production (per day) in the same level. So, the 6 countries have fixed reserves and production 1. statistics for Bahrain Crude oil reserves (million barrels) = 124.6 be careful in million Crude oil producti

  • Q : Data Description 1. If the mean number

    1. If the mean number of hours of television watched by teenagers per week is 12 with a standard deviation of 2 hours, what proportion of teenagers watch 16 to 18 hours of TV a week? (Assume a normal distribution.) A. 2.1% B. 4.5% C. 0.3% D. 4.2% 2. The probability of an offender having a s

  • Q : Model Checking Approach Model Checking

    Model Checking Approach: • Specify program model and exhaustively evaluate that model against a speci?cation        –Check that properties hold