--%>

Computers playing games

How Computers playing games can be categorized according to different dimensions?

E

Expert

Verified

Computers playing games:

Competing against each other in the form of a game is nothing new. Egyptians and Chinese have archived games which date back to far before the year zero. Games can be categorized according to different dimensions. Three examples are:

(1) the number of players,

(2) whether chance is involved, and

(3) how many information a player has.

With the upcoming of computers human beings were tempted to let the computer play those games. The reason why scientists are interested in research on board games is that the rules of games are mostly exact and well defined which makes it easy to translate them to a program that is suitable for a computer to run (Van den Herik, 1983). The research in board games obtained a huge impulse in 1944 when Von Neumann republished his article about the minimax algorithm (Von Neumann, 1928) together with Morgenstern in the book “Theory of Games and Economic Behavior” (Von Neumann and Morgenstern, 1944). These ideas were picked up by Shannon (1950) and Turing (1953) who tried to let a computer play Chess as intelligently as possible. Since then much research is performed on new methods, on a variety of games (Murray, 1952) and on other problems to make the computer a worthy opponent for the human player (Schaeffer and Van den Herik, 2002). One field in this area of research are the board games which have full information and are played by two persons. Chess is the classical example of this kind of a game and a great deal of effort has been devoted in the past to the construction of a good chess player. The most pregnant success so far in this area was the result when Deep Blue achieved to win against world chess champion Garry Kasparov (Newborn, 1996).

   Related Questions in Basic Statistics

  • Q : Point of estimate standing data se to

    standing data se to develop a point of estimate

  • Q : Sample z test and Sample t test A

    A random sample X1, X2, …, Xn is from a normal population with mean µ and variance σ2. If σ is unknown, give a 95% confidence interval of the population mean, and interpret it. Discuss the major diff

  • Q : State Littles Law Little’s Law : • L =

    Little’s Law: • L = λR = XR • Lq = λW = XW • Steady state system • Little’s Law holds as long as customers are not destroyed or&nbs

  • Q : Probability how can i calculate

    how can i calculate cumulative probabilities of survival

  • Q : Average think time Software monitor

    Software monitor data for an interactive system shows a CPU utilization of 75%, a 3 second CPU service demand, a response time of 15 seconds, and 10 active users. Determine the average think time of these users?

  • Q : Develop the most appropriate regression

    Predicting Courier Costs The law firm of Adams, Babcock, and Connors is located in the Dallas-Fort metroplex.  Randall Adams is the senior and founding partner of the firm.  John Babcock has been a partne

  • Q : Safety and Liveness in Model Checking

    Safety and Liveness in Model Checking Approach; •? Safety: Nothing bad happens •? Liveness: Something good happens •? Model checking is especially good at verifying safety and liveness properties    –?Concurrency i

  • Q : Sample Questions in Graphical Solution

    Solved problems in Graphical Solution Procedure, sample assignments and homework Questions: Minimize Z = 10x1 + 4x2 Subject to

  • Q : Creating Grouped Frequency Distribution

    Creating Grouped Frequency Distribution: A) At first we have to determine the biggest and smallest values. B) Then we have to Calculate the Range = Maximum - Minimum C) Choose the number of classes wished for. This is generally between 5 to 20. D) Find out the class width by dividing the range b

  • Q : Hw An experiment is conducted in which

    An experiment is conducted in which 60 participants each fill out a personality test, but not according to the way they see themselves. Instead, 20 are randomly assigned to fill it out according to the way they think a parent sees them (i.e. how a parent would fill it out to describe the participant