--%>

Computers playing games

How Computers playing games can be categorized according to different dimensions?

E

Expert

Verified

Computers playing games:

Competing against each other in the form of a game is nothing new. Egyptians and Chinese have archived games which date back to far before the year zero. Games can be categorized according to different dimensions. Three examples are:

(1) the number of players,

(2) whether chance is involved, and

(3) how many information a player has.

With the upcoming of computers human beings were tempted to let the computer play those games. The reason why scientists are interested in research on board games is that the rules of games are mostly exact and well defined which makes it easy to translate them to a program that is suitable for a computer to run (Van den Herik, 1983). The research in board games obtained a huge impulse in 1944 when Von Neumann republished his article about the minimax algorithm (Von Neumann, 1928) together with Morgenstern in the book “Theory of Games and Economic Behavior” (Von Neumann and Morgenstern, 1944). These ideas were picked up by Shannon (1950) and Turing (1953) who tried to let a computer play Chess as intelligently as possible. Since then much research is performed on new methods, on a variety of games (Murray, 1952) and on other problems to make the computer a worthy opponent for the human player (Schaeffer and Van den Herik, 2002). One field in this area of research are the board games which have full information and are played by two persons. Chess is the classical example of this kind of a game and a great deal of effort has been devoted in the past to the construction of a good chess player. The most pregnant success so far in this area was the result when Deep Blue achieved to win against world chess champion Garry Kasparov (Newborn, 1996).

   Related Questions in Basic Statistics

  • Q : What is Forced Flow Law Forced Flow Law

    Forced Flow Law: • The forced flow law captures the relationship between the various components in the system. It states that the throughputs or flows, in all parts of a system must be proportional t

  • Q : Simplified demonstration of Littles Law

    Simplified demonstration of Little’s Law:

    Q : How to solve statistics assignment in

    How to solve staistics assignment, i need some help in solving stats assignment on AVOVA based problems. Could you help in solving this?

  • Q : Networks of queues Networks of queues •

    Networks of queues • Typically, the flow of customers/request through a system may involve a number of different processing nodes.– IP packets through a computer network– Orders through a manufactur

  • Q : Program Evaluation and Review

    Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) A) Developed by US Navy and a consulting firm in 1958 for the Polaris submarine project. B) Technique as for CPM method, but acti

  • Q : Cumulative Frequency and Relative

    Explain differences between Cumulative Frequency and Relative Frequency?

  • Q : Statistics for Management Assignment

    Q : Average think time Software monitor

    Software monitor data for an interactive system shows a CPU utilization of 75%, a 3 second CPU service demand, a response time of 15 seconds, and 10 active users. Determine the average think time of these users?

  • Q : State the hypotheses At Western

    At Western University the historical mean of scholarship examination score for freshman applications is 900. Population standard deviation is assumed to be known as 180. Each year, the assistant dean uses a sample of applications to determine whether the mean ex

  • Q : Write out the null hypothesis 1.

    1. (AAC/ACA c9q1).  For each of the following studies, decide whether you can reject the null hypothesis that the groups come from identical populations. Use the alpha = .05 level.1a.

    ©TutorsGlobe All rights reserved 2022-2023.