Questions
Question 1
Regarding the legal framework for international awards, which one of the below statements is correct? (You should choose only one option and explain why in 2 paragraphs)
a. For a strict international commercial disputes the relevant legal instruments are the ICSID Convention, The New York Convention and UNCITRAL Rules. Why?
b. For a strict international investment disputes the only relevant legal instrument is the ICSID Convention. Why?
c. For both, international commercial disputes and investment disputes the UNCITRAL Rules, and the New York Convention are relevant legal instruments. Why?
d. None of the above. Why?
Question 2
The choice-of-law issues that can arise from an international arbitral award may cover:
a) The formal requirements applicable to an international arbitral award.
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g) The preclusive effect of an international arbitral award.
Question 3
Concerning the case Yusuf Ahmed v Toys R., mention (only mention) the legal issues discussed on an arbitral award (Please follow the format of the examples shown below) (Use attached case)
1. The issue of the vacancy or modification of an arbitral award (page... paragraph...)
2.
3.
4.
5.
6. The role of local courts in enforcing an international an arbitral award (page ... paragraph...)
Question 4
In which case an award was rendered in the territory of a foreign state but considered a domestic award and accordingly subject todomestic law of the state? (Choose between cases which names attached at last page of the PDF)
a. Mention the case
b. Do you agree with the decision?
(i) Yes, because...
(ii) No, because...
Question 5 (in two paragraphs)
What is the distinction, if any, between awards and procedural orders rendered in an arbitral proceeding?