Discuss liquidity issues of the three companies


Homework

Write 5 to 7 pages comparative financial statement analysis of the three companies listed below. In this analysis, you will discuss the financial health of these companies with the ultimate goal of making a recommendation to other investors. Your paper should consist of the following sections: Company Overview, Comparison of Accounting Methods, Ratio Analysis, Recommendation, Conclusions. You will also submit an appendix as a separate document. Additional research may be necessary to provide company background information, or to support your analysis and recommendations. Your paper needs to include a minimum of two scholarly, peer-reviewed, and/or credible resources in addition to the textbook as references.

Download the Form 10-K for each company.

The Coca-Cola Company: Form 10-K (Links to an external site.) - Financial statements and notes start on page 60.

Accounts receivable, page 81
Inventories, page 82
Depreciation, page 96
Goodwill, page 83
Keurig Dr Pepper Annual Report (Links to an external site.)
Click on the 2018 Annual Report
Accounts receivable, page 72
Inventories, page 72
Depreciation, page 73
Goodwill, page 74

PepsiCo Annual Report (Links to an external site.) - Financial statements and notes start on page 79.
Accounts receivable, page 124
Inventories, page 89
Depreciation, page 95
Goodwill, page 88

Here is a breakdown of the sections within the body of the homework (Use paragraph headings to indicate each section):

Company Overview

Provide a brief overview of the three companies (at least two pages). What industry is it in? What are its main products or services? Who are its competitors? Where is the company located?

Ratio Analysis

a. Calculate the current ratio, quick ratio, gross profit percentage, inventory turnover, accounts receivable turnover and asset turnover ratios for all three companies for the current year.

b. Note: Cash includes cash and cash equivalents and short term investments.

c. Explain how the ratio is calculated and discuss and interpret the ratios that you calculated.

d. Discuss potential liquidity issues based on your calculations of the current and quick ratios.

e. Are there any factors that could be erroneously influencing the results of the ratios?

f. Discuss liquidity issues of the three companies.

g. Comparison of Accounting Methods

In your paper, ascertain from the notes of the financial statements the following:

a. Explain the difference between the allowance method and the direct write off method for accounts receivable. Document the method used for each of the three companies.

b. Explain the difference between the straight line, double declining balance and the unit-of-production depreciation methods. Document the method used for each of the three companies.

c. Explain the difference between LIFO and FIFO and document the method used for each of the three companies.

d. Explain the different categories of intangible assets and document the method used for each of the three companies.

e. Recommendation

f. Based on your analysis, would you recommend an individual invest in these companies? What strengths do you see? What risks do you see? It is perfectly acceptable to state that you would recommend avoiding this company, as long as you provide support for your position.

Format your homework according to the give formatting requirements:

a. The answer must be double spaced, typed, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides.

b. The response also includes a cover page containing the title of the homework, the course title, the student's name, and the date. The cover page is not included in the required page length.

c. Also include a reference page. The references and Citations should follow APA format. The reference page is not included in the required page length.

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Financial Accounting: Discuss liquidity issues of the three companies
Reference No:- TGS03128214

Now Priced at $50 (50% Discount)

Recommended (92%)

Rated (4.4/5)