Case- Wrench LLC v. Taco Bell Corporation
https://www.leagle.com/decision/2001702256F3d446_1661/WRENCH%20LLC%20v.%20TACO%20BELL%20CORP.
Case Questions
Critical legal thinking- What does the doctrine of implied-in-fact contract provide? Explain
Ethics- Did Taco Bell act ethically in this case? Did Chiat/Day act ethically in this case?
Contemporary Business- What is the purpose of recognizing implied-in-fact contracts? Do you think there was an implied-in-fact contract in this case? If so what damages should have been awarded to the plaintiffs?
Brief the facts of the case and assume your boss is seeking your opinions as noted in the Critical Legal Thinking, Ethics, and Contemporary Business questions. Argue both sides of all issues.
2. Law Case with Answers at least 200 words
Instructions: Read California and Hawaiian Sugar Company v. Sun Ship, Inc. found in the Cheeseman textbook, pages 222-223.
Brief the facts of the case and assume your boss is seeking your opinions on whether the use of liquidated damage clauses in contracts is good or bad for your business by giving examples of when the clause should and should not be used.
Provide convincing arguments for both sides of this issue.
https://openjurist.org/794/f2d/1433/california-and-hawaiian-sugar-company-v-sun-ship-inc