Solved: Compare impact between the tsunami in indian oceanin-japan, History

+44 141 628 6080
[email protected]

Compare impact between the tsunami in indian oceanin-japan

Assignment:

DISASTERS/HAZARD AND VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS

Case Assignment Overview

Disasters: Tsunamis

2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami

One of the deadliest tsunamis in recorded history occurred in the Indian Ocean in 2004.

"The 26 December 2004 tsunami was the most deadly tsunami and one of the greatest disasters in historical times. Some 280,000 people were killed in South Asia and East Africa. Sumatra Indonesian island was the most affected area with about 178,000 dead. It sparked unparalleled media-related impact and humanitarian aid."

2011 Japan Tsunami

In order to understand the magnitude of the Japan tsunami, view the brief video clip containing dramatic footage of the waves in action. Biggest Tsunami Waves Caught on Tape.

"Less than an hour after the earthquake, the first of many tsunami waves hit Japan's coastline. The tsunami waves reached run-up heights (how far the wave surges inland above sea level) of up to 128 feet (39 meters) at Miyako city and traveled inland as far as 6 miles (10 km) in Sendai. The tsunami flooded an estimated area of approximately 217 square miles (561 square kilometers) in Japan."

Case Assignment

Based on information obtained from readings in the Background section, compare and contrast the impact between the tsunami in the Indian Ocean (2004) with the tsunami in Japan (2011). In your paper, make mention of:

• Cause of tsunami

• Amount of damage

• Amount of land mass involved

• Mortality rates

• Mitigation measures before incident

• Mitigation measures after incident

• Lessons learned

Sources:

Kelman, I., Spence, R., Palmer, J., Petal, M., & Saito, K. (2008). Tourists and disasters: lessons from the 26 December 2004 tsunamis. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 12(3), 105-113

Oskin, B. (2017). Japan earthquake & tsunami of 2011: Facts and information, Livescience.

Assignment Expectations

Assignments should be at least three pages double-spaced, not counting the cover or reference page. Paper format: (a) Cover page, (b) Header, (c) Body. Submit your assignment by the last day of this module.

• Relevance-All content is connected to the question.

• Precision-Specific question is addressed. Statements, facts, and statistics are specific and accurate.

• Depth of discussion-Points that lead to deeper issues are presented and integrated.

• Breadth-Multiple perspectives and references, multiple issues/factors are considered.

• Evidence-Points are well-supported with facts, statistics, and references.

• Logic-Presented discussion makes sense; conclusions are logically supported by premises, statements, or factual information.

• Clarity-Writing is concise, understandable, and contains sufficient detail or examples.

• Objectivity-Avoids use of first person and subjective bias.

• References-Sources are listed at the end of the paper (APA style preferred).

SLP

DISASTERS/HAZARD AND VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS

Project Summary: The Session Long Project will involve developing a disaster management program for a specific country that will include hazard analysis, prevention, preparedness, response, and recovery plans.

Epidemiology of Disasters

Respond to the following:

1. Select a country for your Session Long Project. Describe the sectors within your country that would be most vulnerable to your selected disaster. NOTE: Data on your Country's disasters can be accessed from EM-DAT Disaster Database link in the Background reading.

2. Complete a Hazard Analysis Table for your selected country (as described below). From your results, select a high-priority disaster for the remainder of your Session Long Project.

• Column 1-Disaster: List the disasters of the past 30 years in the Hazard Analysis Table. See the EM-DAT country profile

• Column 2-Frequency: Rank the disasters in terms of frequency in the past 30 years (i.e., most frequent to least frequent). Use a numerical scale between 1 and 4, with 1 referring to the most frequent disaster and 4 referring to the least frequent disaster.

• Column 3-Killed: Rank the disasters in terms of average number of deaths per disaster in the past 30 years. Use a scale between 1 and 4, with 1 referring to the highest number of deaths per disaster and 4 referring to the lowest number of deaths per disaster.

• Column 4-Affected: Rank the disasters in terms of average number of people affected per disaster in the past 30 years. Use a scale between 1 and 4, with 1 referring to the highest number affected per disaster and 4 referring to the lowest number affected per disaster.

• Column 5-Cost: Rank the disasters in terms of average cost per disaster in the past 30 years. Use a scale between 1 and 4, with 1 referring to the highest cost per disaster and 4 referring to the lowest cost per disaster.

• Column 6-Advance Warning: Rank the disasters in terms of expected warning time as follows: 1) no warning; 2) from 1 hour to 24 hours' warning; and, 3) more than 24 hours' warning.

• Column 7-Priority: As a disaster manager for this country, how would you rank these disasters in terms of priority? Using the information in the table above, rank the disasters in terms of priority, with 1 being the highest priority. Provide a brief justification for your priority rating.

SLP Assignment Expectations

Assignments should be 2 to 3 pages double-spaced, not counting the cover or reference page. Paper format: (a) Cover page, (b) Header, (c) Body. Submit your assignment by the last day of this module.