--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Explain Factorisation by Fermats method

Factorisation by Fermat's method: This method, dating from 1643, depends on a simple and standard algebraic identity. Fermat's observation is that if we wish to nd two factors of n, it is enough if we can express n as the di fference of two squares. This is because if n = a2 - b2, then we have immediately

n = a2 - b2 = (a+b)(a - b);

and so we have found two factors, a+b and a - b, of n.

It is possible here that a - b might equal 1, in which case we will only have found the trivial factorisation n = n x 1, but we can arrange matters so that this will only happen if n has no other factorisation - i.e., is prime.

At first glance, it may seem over-optimistic to hope that an expression for n as the di fference of two squares will exist.

But assume that n is odd, which we can always do if we are trying to factorise n. Then if n = uv and we put

a = 1/2(u+v) and b = 1/2(u - v);

we have n = a2 - b2 (note that a and b are both integers if n is odd), so that a representation of n as the difference of two squares does exist. (In fact, it is easy to see that the above formulae define a one-to-one correspondence between representations of n as the di erence of two squares and as the product of two factors - exercise.)

   Related Questions in Mathematics

  • Q : Graph Theory is the n-Dimensional Qn

    is the n-Dimensional Qn Hamiltonian? Prove tour answer

    		•
  • Q : Maths A cricketer cn throw a ball to a

    A cricketer cn throw a ball to a max horizontl distnce of 100m. If he throws d same ball vertically upwards then the max height upto which he can throw is????

    		•
  • Q : Problem on Prime theory Suppose that p

    Suppose that p and q are different primes and n = pq. (i) Express p + q in terms of Ø(n) and n. (ii) Express p - q in terms of p + q and n. (iii) Expl

    		•
  • Q : Econ For every value of real GDP,

    For every value of real GDP, actual investment equals

    		•
  • Q : What is Non-Logical Vocabulary

    Non-Logical Vocabulary: 1. Predicates, called also relation symbols, each with its associated arity. For our needs, we may assume that the number of predicates is finite. But this is not essential. We can have an infinite list of predicates, P

    		•
  • Q : Define Big-O notation Big-O notation :

    Big-O notation: If f(n) and g(n) are functions of a natural number n, we write f(n) is O(g(n)) and we say f is big-O of g if there is a constant C (independent of n) such that f

    		•
  • Q : Statistics math Detailed explanation of

    Detailed explanation of requirements for Part C-1 The assignment states the following requirement for Part 1, which is due at the end of Week 4: “Choose a topic from your field of study. Keep in mind you will need to collect at least [sic] 3- points of data for this project. Construct the sheet y

    		•
  • Q : Define Well-formed formulas or Wffs

    Wffs (Well-formed formulas): These are defined inductively by the following clauses:    (i) If  P  is an n-ary predicate and  t1, …, tn are terms, then P(t1, …, t

    		•
  • Q : Who had find Monte Carlo and finite

    Who had find Monte Carlo and finite differences of the binomial model?

    		•
  • Q : Law of iterated expectations for

     Prove the law of iterated expectations for continuous random variables. 2. Prove that the bounds in Chebyshev's theorem cannot be improved upon. I.e., provide a distribution that satisfies the bounds exactly for k ≥1, show that it satisfies the bounds exactly, and draw its PDF. T

    		•