--%>

Explain Factorisation by Fermats method

Factorisation by Fermat's method: This method, dating from 1643, depends on a simple and standard algebraic identity. Fermat's observation is that if we wish to nd two factors of n, it is enough if we can express n as the di fference of two squares. This is because if n = a2 - b2, then we have immediately

n = a2 - b2 = (a+b)(a - b);

and so we have found two factors, a+b and a - b, of n.

It is possible here that a - b might equal 1, in which case we will only have found the trivial factorisation n = n x 1, but we can arrange matters so that this will only happen if n has no other factorisation - i.e., is prime.

At first glance, it may seem over-optimistic to hope that an expression for n as the di fference of two squares will exist.

But assume that n is odd, which we can always do if we are trying to factorise n. Then if n = uv and we put

a = 1/2(u+v) and b = 1/2(u - v);

we have n = a2 - b2 (note that a and b are both integers if n is odd), so that a representation of n as the difference of two squares does exist. (In fact, it is easy to see that the above formulae define a one-to-one correspondence between representations of n as the di erence of two squares and as the product of two factors - exercise.)

   Related Questions in Mathematics

  • Q : Containee problem For queries Q 1 and Q

    For queries Q1 and Q2, we say Q1 is containedin Q2, denoted Q1 C Q2, iff Q1(D) C Q2

  • Q : Problem on Prime theory Suppose that p

    Suppose that p and q are different primes and n = pq. (i) Express p + q in terms of Ø(n) and n. (ii) Express p - q in terms of p + q and n. (iii) Expl

  • Q : Explain Factorisation by trial division

    Factorisation by trial division: The essential idea of factorisation by trial division is straightforward. Let n be a positive integer. We know that n is either prime or has a prime divisor less than or equal to √n. Therefore, if we divide n in

  • Q : Econ For every value of real GDP,

    For every value of real GDP, actual investment equals

  • Q : Law of iterated expectations for

     Prove the law of iterated expectations for continuous random variables. 2. Prove that the bounds in Chebyshev's theorem cannot be improved upon. I.e., provide a distribution that satisfies the bounds exactly for k ≥1, show that it satisfies the bounds exactly, and draw its PDF. T

  • Q : Formal logic It's a problem set, they

    It's a problem set, they are attached. it's related to Sider's book which is "Logic to philosophy" I attached the book too. I need it on feb22 but feb23 still work

  • Q : Elasticity of Demand For the demand

    For the demand function D(p)=410-0.2p(^2), find the maximum revenue.

  • Q : Simulation with Arena An office of

    An office of state license bureau has two types of arrivals. Individuals interested in purchasing new plates are characterized to have inter-arrival times distributed as EXPO(6.8) and service times as TRIA(808, 13.7, 15.2); all times are in minutes. Individuals who want to renew or apply for a new d

  • Q : Where would we be without stochastic

    Where would we be without stochastic or Ito^ calculus?

  • Q : Row-echelon matrix Determine into which

    Determine into which of the following 3 kinds (A), (B) and (C) the matrices (a) to (e) beneath can be categorized:       Type (A): The matrix is in both reduced row-echelon form and row-echelon form. Type (B): The matrix