--%>

Explain Factorisation by Fermats method

Factorisation by Fermat's method: This method, dating from 1643, depends on a simple and standard algebraic identity. Fermat's observation is that if we wish to nd two factors of n, it is enough if we can express n as the di fference of two squares. This is because if n = a2 - b2, then we have immediately

n = a2 - b2 = (a+b)(a - b);

and so we have found two factors, a+b and a - b, of n.

It is possible here that a - b might equal 1, in which case we will only have found the trivial factorisation n = n x 1, but we can arrange matters so that this will only happen if n has no other factorisation - i.e., is prime.

At first glance, it may seem over-optimistic to hope that an expression for n as the di fference of two squares will exist.

But assume that n is odd, which we can always do if we are trying to factorise n. Then if n = uv and we put

a = 1/2(u+v) and b = 1/2(u - v);

we have n = a2 - b2 (note that a and b are both integers if n is odd), so that a representation of n as the difference of two squares does exist. (In fact, it is easy to see that the above formulae define a one-to-one correspondence between representations of n as the di erence of two squares and as the product of two factors - exercise.)

   Related Questions in Mathematics

  • Q : Explain the work and model proposed by

    Explain the work and model proposed by Richardson.

  • Q : Calculus I need it within 4 hours. Due

    I need it within 4 hours. Due time March 15, 2014. 3PM Pacific Time. (Los Angeles, CA)

  • Q : Problem on Prime theory Suppose that p

    Suppose that p and q are different primes and n = pq. (i) Express p + q in terms of Ø(n) and n. (ii) Express p - q in terms of p + q and n. (iii) Expl

  • Q : Who independently developed

    Who independently developed a model for simply pricing risky assets?

  • Q : What is Non-Logical Vocabulary

    Non-Logical Vocabulary: 1. Predicates, called also relation symbols, each with its associated arity. For our needs, we may assume that the number of predicates is finite. But this is not essential. We can have an infinite list of predicates, P

  • Q : Abstract Algebra let a, b, c, d be

    let a, b, c, d be integers. Prove the following statements: (a) if a|b and b|c. (b) if a|b and ac|bd. (c) if d|a and d|b then d|(xa+yb) for any x, y EZ

  • Q : Profit-loss based problems A leather

    A leather wholesaler supplies leather to shoe companies. The manufacturing quantity requirements of leather differ depending upon the amount of leather ordered by the shoe companies to him. Due to the volatility in orders, he is unable to precisely predict what will b

  • Q : Formal logic It's a problem set, they

    It's a problem set, they are attached. it's related to Sider's book which is "Logic to philosophy" I attached the book too. I need it on feb22 but feb23 still work

  • Q : Mean and standard deviation of the data

    Below is the amount of rainfall (in cm) every month for the last 3 years in a particular location: 130 172 142 150 144 117 165 182 104 120 190 99 170 205 110 80 196 127 120 175

  • Q : Problem on mixed-strategy equilibrium

    Assume three Offices (A, B, & C) in downtown,  simultaneously decide whether to situate in a new Building. The payoff matrix is illustrated below. What is (are) the pure stratgy Nash equilibrium (or equilibria) and mixed-strtegy equilibrium of the game?