Why was it important to randomize in assigning the subjects


Omega-3, finis

Exercises 3, 2, and 1 describe an experiment investigating the effectiveness of omega-3 fats in treating bipolar disorder. Suppose some of the 30 subjects were very active people who walked a lot or got vigorous exercise several times a week, while others tended to be more sedentary, working office jobs and watching a lot of TV. Why might researchers choose to block the subjects by activity level before randomly assigning them to the omega-3 and placebo groups?

Exercise 1:
Omega-3 revisited. Exercises 3 and 2 describe an experiment investigating a dietary approach to treating bipolar disorder. Researchers randomly assigned 30 subjects to two treatment groups, one group taking a high dose of omega-3 fats and the other a placebo.
a) Why was it important to randomize in assigning the subjects to the two groups?

b) What would be the advantages and disadvantages of using 100 subjects instead of 30?

Exercise 2:
Omega-3. Exercise 3 describes an experiment that showed that high doses of omega-3 fats might be of benefit to people with bipolar disorder. The experiment involved a control group of subjects who received a placebo. Why didn't the experimenters just give everyone the omega-3 fats to see if they improved?

Exercise 3:
Over a 4-month period, among 30 people with bipolar disorder, patients who were given a high dose (10 g/day) of omega-3 fats from fish oil improved more than those given a placebo. (Archives of General Psychiatry 56 [1999]: 407)

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Basic Statistics: Why was it important to randomize in assigning the subjects
Reference No:- TGS02198558

Expected delivery within 24 Hours