Why the court got correct and explain why court was wrong


Business Law Essay Problem

10th Justice; Takings Clause

As you learned, the government can enact the concept of eminent domain and "take" private property so long as it is for the "public use" and the owner is justly compensated. This concept is hotly contested and often results in a clash between property owners and the government.

Developers and businesses generally like the concept of eminent domain and really attempt to stretch the term "public use" in order to expand business. In 2005 the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) decided in Kelo v. New London by a narrow margin of 5-4 that city's taking of private property to sell for private development qualified as a "public use" within the meaning of the takings clause.

Explain why the court got this correct AND explain why the court was wrong. Lastly, if you were the 10th justice how would you vote and why?

The response should include a reference list. Using double-space, Times New Roman 12 pnt font, one-inch margins, and APA style of writing and citations.

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Business Law and Ethics: Why the court got correct and explain why court was wrong
Reference No:- TGS03090766

Now Priced at $20 (50% Discount)

Recommended (94%)

Rated (4.6/5)