Discuss the below in detail:
1: Most definitely a lot of companies only keep the meaning of diversity as different races and genders, but a lot forget to include different age groups, cultures, religions, and other types of backgrounds. I feel some companies especially the ones whom are getting paid for diversity don't care to make their workplace diverse in anything else other than just race and gender because of the ignorance that still exist in society.
2: Great post about diversity and inclusion. It sounds like you work with some pretty awesome people also. I feel that working in a diverse employment background is awesome. My current work environment is very diverse and we have several different cultural and religious beliefs. We all get along well and respect each other individual beliefs. I feel that this is important because nobody feels isolated or disrespected because of their cultural difference, personal, or religious beliefs.
3: According to the text, there are many examples of agency relationships, including a real estate broker who is employed by an owner to sell the owner's house, an attorney who is hired to represent a client, an executive who works for a corporation, and a partner who acts on behalf of a partnership. Agency is governed by a large body of common law known as agency law. The formation of agencies, the duties of principals and agents, contract and tort liability of principals and agents, and termination of agencies are discussed in this chapter.(Cheeseman,2014)
4: Thank you for responding Isa. What we must understand when it comes to law, it leaves very little room for personal opinion. According to Cheeseman, (2014) intentional law are acts such as assault, battery, false imprisonment, and other intentional conduct that causes injury to another person. A principal is not liable for the intentional torts of agents and employees that are committed outside the principal's scope of business.
However, the act of the agent was not committed outside the principal's scope of business. The agent was on the clock when the assault happened. Considering this fact, a work-related test would be applied. Under this test, if an agent commits an intentional tort within a work-related time or space, then the principal is liable for any injuries caused by the agents intentional torts. So, the agent's motivation is immaterial.
Regarding the agent, the defendant can bring claims against not only the principal, but the agent too. The court will decide if there is any relevance.