--%>

Why children are more likely to have a security object


Problem:

How can I make notes with bullet points in this paragraph?

When I wasn't around, he dragged his Pooh bear everywhere, some- times by an ear or maybe by a leg. Pooh really seemed to help him feel safe when I wasn't available. Children are more likely to have a security object if their mothers do not breast-feed them, do not hold them while they go to sleep, and do not sleep with them in the same bed (Green et al., 2004; Hobara, 2003). Pets such as cats and dogs can also serve as security objects and provide comfort and emotional support for children (Melson, 2003; Triebenbacher, 1998). But are children really "attached" to these objects? In a technical sense, no. Attachment is not just about reducing children's distress. Attachment figures also respond to children's other needs and support their interactions with the world. They give the child an expectation of availability and responsiveness and a sense that they are stronger and wiser than the child. This goes beyond the capacities of the softest blanket, the most loyal dog, the cuddliest kitten. These objects do not offer the extraordinary scaffolding and contingent responsiveness that parents do. Moreover, they are no substitute for "real" attachment relationships. Even with a pet or a blankie, children still need love and attention from their caregivers. Need Assignment Help?

 

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Other Subject: Why children are more likely to have a security object
Reference No:- TGS03488960

Expected delivery within 24 Hours