Who should make the decision about taking risks with others' lives in designing products? Why? Should a person be permitted to place a value on human life? Should a company? Should the government? If not, how would decisions be made about whether to market certain products (that might be risky for some, but helpful for others), how much those who have lost family members in disasters should be compensated, and so on? How do you feel about the use of cost-benefit analysis where human life is part of the cost calculation? Might the infusion of moral language have changed the decision makers' thinking? For example, what if decision makers had talked about their responsibility for killing 180 human beings? Given that all automobiles are unsafe to some degree, where do you draw the line on product safety? How safe is safe enough? Who decides? Your assignment should contain at least 375 words (Times New Roman, 12-point, double-spaced). Either number your answers or use a separate paragraph for each question. Remember to proof your work for spelling and grammar before submitting.