What parts of prey animals would have had thinnest amount


Problem

Dinosaur toothmarks that only penetrated flesh have not been described from the fossil record because of their low preservation potential. What parts of a prey animal (such as herbivorous dinosaur) might have had the thickest amount of flesh covering the bones and thus would not have preserved deep bites? Conversely, what parts of prey animals would have had the thinnest amount of flesh covering their bones and would more likely preserve toothmarks?

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
History: What parts of prey animals would have had thinnest amount
Reference No:- TGS03273423

Expected delivery within 24 Hours