What kinds of evidence does the text rely on and how valid


Assessment Task:

Subject is Nursing research

A Strengths-Based Group Intervention for Women Who Experienced Child Sexual Abuse - critical commentary of journal article

Produce a 2000 word critical commentary of a journal article as provided

The following list of criteria and focus questions may be useful for reading the text and for preparing the critical review.

Remember to check your assignment instructions for more specific criteria and focus questions that should form the basis of your review.

The length of the review / assignment will determine how many criteria you will address in your critique.

Criteria Possible focus questions

Significance and contribution to the field

-What is the author's aim?

-To what extent has this aim been achieved?

-What does this text add to the body of knowledge? (This could be in terms of theory, data and/or practical application)

-What relationship does it bear to other works in the field?

-What is missing/not stated?

-Is this a problem?

Methodology or approach (this usually applies to more formal, research-based texts) -What approach was used for the research? (eg; quantitative or qualitative, analysis/review of theory or current practice, comparative, case study, personal reflection etc...)

- How objective/biased is the approach?

- Are the results valid and reliable?

- What analytical framework is used to discuss the results?

Argument and use of evidence

- Is there a clear problem, statement or hypothesis?

- What claims are made?

- Is the argument consistent?

- What kinds of evidence does the text rely on?

- How valid and reliable is the evidence?

- How effective is the evidence in supporting the argument?

- What conclusions are drawn?

- Are these conclusions justified?

Writing style and text structure -Does the writing style suit the intended audience? (eg; expert/non-expert, academic/non-academic)

-What is the organising principle of the text? Could it be better organised?

Structure of a Critical Review

Critical reviews, both short (one page) and long (four pages), usually have a similar structure. Check your assignment instructions for formatting and structural specifications. Headings are usually optional for longer reviews and can be helpful for the reader.

Introduction

The length of an introduction is usually one paragraph for a journal article review and two or three paragraphs for a longer book review. Include a few opening sentences that announce the author(s) and the title, and briefly explain the topic of the text. Present the aim of the text and summarise the main finding or key argument. Conclude the introduction with a brief statement of your evaluation of the text. This can be a positive or negative evaluation or, as is usually the case, a mixed response.

Summary

Present a summary of the key points along with a limited number of examples. You can also briefly explain the author's purpose/intentions throughout the text and you may briefly describe how the text is organised. The summary should only make up about a third of the critical review.

Critique

The critique should be a balanced discussion and evaluation of the strengths, weakness and notable features of the text. Remember to base your discussion on specific criteria. Good reviews also include other sources to support your evaluation (remember to reference).

You can choose how to sequence your critique. Here are some examples to get you started:

-Most important to least important conclusions you make about the text.
-If your critique is more positive than negative, then present the negative points first and the positive last.
-If your critique is more negative than positive, then present the positive points first and the negative last.
-If there are both strengths and weakness for each criterion you use, you need to decide overall what your judgement is. For example, you may want to comment on a key idea in the text and have both positive and negative comments. You could begin by stating what is good about the idea and then concede and explain how it is limited in some way. While this example shows a mixed evaluation, overall you are probably being more negative than positive.

-In long reviews, you can address each criteria you choose in a paragraph, including both negative and positive points. For very short critical reviews (one page or less) where your comments will be briefer, include a paragraph of positive aspects and another of negative.

-You can also include recommendations for how the text can be improved in terms of ideas, research approach; theories or frameworks used can also be included in the critique section.

Conclusion & References

Conclusion

This is usually a very short paragraph.

-Restate your overall opinion of the text.

-Briefly present recommendations.

-If necessary some further qualification or explanation of your judgement can be included. This can help your critique sound fair and reasonable.

References

If you have used other sources in you review you should also include a list of references at the end of the review.

Attachment:- Article.pdf

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Other Subject: What kinds of evidence does the text rely on and how valid
Reference No:- TGS01112477

Now Priced at $60 (50% Discount)

Recommended (95%)

Rated (4.7/5)