What does each of the examples likely imply about fixed cost


Problem

1. Why would a company want to sacrifice short-run profits to establish market position?

2. The title of an article in The Wall Street Journal was "Pricing of Products Is Still an Art, Often Having Little Link to Costs." In the article, the following cases were cited:

• Vodka pricing: All vodkas are essentially indistinguishable-colorless, tasteless, and odorless- and the cost of producing vodka is independent of brand name, yet prices differ substantially.

• Perfume: A $100 bottle of perfume may contain $4 to $6 worth of ingredients.

• Jeans and "alligator/animal" shirts: The "plain pocket" jeans and the Lacoste knockoffs often cost 40 percent less than the brand-name items, yet the knockoffs are essentially identical to the brand-name items.

a. Do these differences undermine economists' analysis of pricing? Why or why not?

b. What does each of these examples likely imply about fixed costs and variable costs?

c. What do they likely imply about costs of production versus costs of selling?

d. As what type of market would you characterize each of the above examples?

The response should include a reference list. Double-space, using Times New Roman 12 pnt font, one-inch margins, and APA style of writing and citations.

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Microeconomics: What does each of the examples likely imply about fixed cost
Reference No:- TGS02120647

Expected delivery within 24 Hours