Problem
Imagine you're a new member of Team Success at the company MakeMoney. The team is tasked with the critically important job of determining the future strategy of the organization, and is full of high-status members. You're very excited to join the team for a variety of reasons, chief among them the opportunity to network and increase your own visibility within the organization. During your first day, you observe a well-run meeting with an already cohesive group. Although you are new to the group, the other members as well as your company have already committed significant time and resources into the team's objectives. Despite the meeting going well, you begin to have the uncomfortable feeling that the rest of the group is missing something big in their analysis of the problem. In fact, from your perspective they seem pretty far away from a good solution, so two thirds of the way through the meeting you tentatively voice your concerns. Everyone stares at you for a moment before disagreeing with your point, and one by one, the other team members throw out examples supporting the original idea, and the team pushes forward at full steam. Assuming your concerns are justified.
This above is the senario for the next question
What are two individual-level decision-making biases that could be at play in the scenario above? Make sure to define each, and explain how each may apply to this situation.