Problem:
Understanding Racism in Canada course write in a descriptive way your "Response" to this peer post and consider the following:
1. Did the student's post help you in understanding the material? What were some of the strengths of the student's response? Need Assignment Help?
2. Are there factors that the student did not address that might help to further clarify the material? Would including different factors change the response and if so, how?
3. Does the student's response indicate any particular theoretical leanings (e.g., conflict theory, social determinants approach, structural functionalism, symbolic interactionismcritical race theory, feminist theory)? Would you approach the question differently and why? (See page 16 for the rubric). Use simple vocabulary and make it look natural, write it in descriptive way
This week's readings challenged me to think deeply about how race, migration, and labor are shaped through public discourse and institutional practices, particularly in relation to children and care work. In Racializing Childhood by Hannah Noel (2025) illustrates how ULS. political rhetoric constructs white children as uniquely vulnerable while portraying Latinx migrant children as undeserving of empathy or protection. Drawing on Natalia Molina's concept of racial scripts, Noel connects the Trump administration's family separation policy with the manufactured panic around critical race theory (CRT). Figures like Jeff Sessions, who justified family separation through biblical appeals, and Christopher Rufo, who deliberately misrepresented CRT on Fox News, demonstrate how agenda setting and priming shape public anxieties to reinforce a white racial frame. This logic enables large-scale book bans, mobilizes groups like Moms for Liberty, and justifies punitive border practices that leave migrant children in overcrowded and unsanitary facilities. What struck me most was Noel's point that these racialized constructions persist across administrations, revealing how deeply xenophobic narratives become embedded in media and policy. The second reading by Walton-Roberts (2023) The Future of Health Care Work and the Place of Migrant Workers Within It, pushed me to think about how similar racialized hierarchies and exclusions operate within the global health-care workforce. Walton-Roberts (2023) shows that internationally educated nurses (IEMs) often immigrant women are essential to Ontario's health system but face systemic barriers such as opaque credentialing processes and labor market segmentation. During COVID-19, instead of being fully integrated, many IENs were channeled into temporary staffing pools, highlighting their marginalization even as they were urgently needed. Yet Walton-Roberts (2023) also documents hopeful developments, Supervisory Practice Experience Partnership (SPEP), credential digitization, and increased registrations (a 132% jump for IENs in early 2022) show how policy shifts can meaningfully address shortages. She also emphasizes how future technologies, Al, automation, robotics, blockchain, will reshape but not replace care work, making the fair integration of immigrant workers crucial for building equitable and resilient health systems. In my analysis, both articles conclude that racialized narratives and institutional structures continue to marginalize migrant communities, whether children at the border or immigrant women in health care, yet they also point toward meaningful pathways for policy change and collective action. Overall, both authors underscore that addressing these inequities requires acknowledging the human dignity and structural vulnerability of the very populations on whorn our systems depend. References: Noel. H. (2025). Chapter 4, Racializing Childhood: Migrant Children, Critical Race Theory, and Agenda Setting in Public Discourse. In Turner, 5. E., & Nilsen, 5. (Eds.). (2025), pp. 95-113. Routledge.