The Great Minneapolis Surplus Store published the following advertisement in a Minneapolis newspaper: "Saturday 9 a.m. 2 Brand New Pastel Mink 3-Skin Scarfs selling for $89.50-Out they go Saturday.
Each . . . $1.00. 1 Black Lapin Stole. Beautiful, Worth $139.50 . . . $1.00. First Come, First Served." Leftkowitz, the first customer admitted to the store on Saturday, tried to buy the Lapin stole.
The store refused to sell, stating that the offer was for women only. Leftkowitz sued. Was the offer definite enough to allow Leftkowitz to tender a valid acceptance? Explain.
Leftkowitz v. Great Minneapolis Surplus Store, 86 N.W.2d 689 (MN).