Larry purchased a Honda Accord back in 1998. He decided to get punch drunk on I-95 and drive 100 miles per hour in Florida in 2000. Larry had just finished getting high on PCP back at Club Mansion when he lost control of his vehicle, his brakes failed, and he slammed into Grandma Pearl who was sitting in her vehicle at a red light. The impact caused Grandma Pearl a broken elbow, sprained ring finger, four broken ribs, and a concussion to her head. It was a miracle she survived! Grandma Pearl consulted with her attorney in 2007 and wanted to file a lawsuit against Larry and the Honda car dealership that sold Larry the car for negligence. Her only wish was that she was aware that her back, left tail light was out. The attorney was unsure whether this jurisdiction applied comparative fault or contributory negligence as their rule of law. Please analyze Grandma Pearl’s lawsuit separately applying the following rules of law: comparative fault, contributory negligence, and negligence. These must be separated by spacing and analyzed individually. Please note the statutory period regarding the Statute of Repose is eight years and eight years for the Statute of Limitations. Please fully analyze this question using I.R.A.C.
1) The issue is whether Larry is liable to Grandma Pearl under comparative fault.
2) The issue is whether Larry is liable to Grandma Pearl under contributory negligence.
3) The issue is whether Larry is liable to Grandma Pearl under negligence.
(Each answers must be limited up to five sentences)