The hospital maintains that it is not liable because dr


On September 29, 1984, Wilton Whitlow was taken to Good Samaritan Hospital's emergency room in Montgomery County, Ohio, because he had suffered a seizure and a blackout. He was examined by Dr. Dennis Aumentado, who prescribed the anti-epileptic medication Dilantin. Mr. Whitlow experienced no further seizures and was monitored as an outpatient at Good Samaritan over the next few weeks. Mr. Whitlow complained to Dr. Aumentado of warm and dry eyes, and his Dilantin does was reduced. On October 20, 1984, he was again admitted to the emergency room with symptoms that were eventually determined to be from Stevens-Johnson syndrome, a condition believed to be caused by a variety of medications. Mr. Whitlow sued Dr. Aumentado and Good Samaritan for malpractice and Parke-Davis, the manufacturer of Dilantin, for breach of warranty. The hospital maintains that it is not liable because Dr. Aumentado was an independent contractor. Is the hospital correct? [Whitlow v. Good Samaritan Hosp., 536 N.E.2d 659 (Ohio).]

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Business Management: The hospital maintains that it is not liable because dr
Reference No:- TGS02789775

Now Priced at $10 (50% Discount)

Recommended (93%)

Rated (4.5/5)