Spence claimed that the corporation was liable and that his


Spence was a promoter in the incorporation of a new business. The new corporation had not yet been formed when he bought Huffman's employment agency to serve as the nucleus of that corporation.

Eventually, the corporation was formed, but it never generated enough cash to pay Huffman for the employment agency. Huffman sued Spence, attempting to hold him personally liable for the amount due.

Spence claimed that the corporation was liable and that his personal assets were not a proper target of the suit. Was Spence correct? Explain.

Spence v. Huffman, 486 P.2d 211 (AZ).

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Management Theories: Spence claimed that the corporation was liable and that his
Reference No:- TGS02175956

Expected delivery within 24 Hours