Victoria’s Secret has apologized for outfitting a runway model in a Native American-style headdress, leopard-print underwear, turquoise jewelry, and high heels. A Chicago Tribune article explained the significance of a headdress, which may explain why the get-up was called offensive:
“Headdresses historically are a symbol of respect, worn by Native American war chiefs and warriors. For many Plains tribes, for example, each feather placed on a headdress has significance and had to be earned through an act of compassion or bravery. Some modern-day Native American leaders have been gifted war bonnets in ceremonies accompanied by prayers and songs.”
A Navajo Nation spokesperson further explained, “Any mockery, whether it’s Halloween, Victoria’s Secret—they are spitting on us. They are spitting on our culture, and it’s upsetting.”
The company responded to criticism with a rather generic apology: “We sincerely apologize as we absolutely had no intention to offend anyone.” In addition, model Karlie Kloss
tweeted her own apology: Karlie Kloss I am deeply sorry if what i wore during VC SHOW offended anyone. I support VC’s decision to remove the outfit from the broadcast.
• As you might expect, not everyone agrees that Victoria’s Secret needed to apologize. Online comments suggested that people should “grow a thicker skin” and that “Indians should get over themselves.” What’s your view?
• How do you assess Victoria’s Secret’s apology? Is this enough? If not, what else should the company do or say?