Rosen argues that hostile environment sexual harassment should be prosecuted as a violation of the right to privacy rather than discrimination. In this way, he hopes to diminish the incentive for employers to violate privacy by monitoring e-mail and other employee activities that might give offense to coworkers. Does Rosen's proposal strike the right balance between privacy and discrimination concerns? Or does he, as Wells and Kracher would probably argue, leave some deserving victims of sexual harassment without legal recourse?