Roger worked in an office that prohibited use of company


Roger worked in an office that prohibited use of company telephones for either local or long-distance calls. Despite this, he did occasionally use the phone to call his children at home with a babysitter, because he was a single dad with sole custody. During a routine audit of phone conversations designed to assure compliance with the requirement not to make personal phone calls, Roger was discovered talking to his children on the company phone, and the company then immediately hung up. When Roger got off the phone, he was fired. He sought to get his job back on the basis that his privacy had been violated. Will Roger likely prevail against the discharge? A. This is violation of Roger's privacy rights, and his discharge will be overturned and he will be returned to duty. B. This is violation of Roger's privacy rights, and he will be paid damages for the wrongful discharge. C. Roger will prevail, because the phone policy was unreasonable. D. Roger will not prevail in the claim of violation of privacy.

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Operation Management: Roger worked in an office that prohibited use of company
Reference No:- TGS01273354

Expected delivery within 24 Hours