Discussion:
Risks and Benefits: Does the End always Justify the Means
1.In assessing risk to benefit, on what bases do you make the ultimate determination of how much risk is acceptable and how much benefit is necessary?
2.How do you determine when and under what circumstances deceit is allowable?What is the criteria that must be met?
3.It has been said that the end never justifies the means used to achieve it. Give one example in history where this principle was violated. What do you think went wrong?
Write your answer/response in detail with examples and facts and figures using APA style of formatting, size 12, font Times new roman and answer must be single spaced.