Reexamine the arguments made by the us government and by


Question: Reexamine the arguments made by the U.S. government and by Google regarding the government's requests for information about users' search requests made during the summer of 2005. Are the government's reasons for why it should have access to that information reasonable? Does Google have an obligation to protect the personal information of its users, with respect to disclosing information about their searches? Could this obligation be overridden by certain kinds of national defense interests? If, for example, the government claimed to need the information to prevent a potential terrorist attack, would that have changed your analysis of the situation? Or does the government have the right, and possibly an obligation to the majority of its citizens, to monitor the searches if doing so could positively affect the outcome of child pornography legislation?

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Management Theories: Reexamine the arguments made by the us government and by
Reference No:- TGS02506117

Now Priced at $15 (50% Discount)

Recommended (95%)

Rated (4.7/5)