Assignment: Case Study: Ethical Decision Making *FOR SOLUTIONS PRO.**
Read the section "Course Case Study" (ATTACHED) and analyze the behavior of the counselor, as a professional, that you consider unethical or unprofessional. Write a brief summary of the questionable behavior. Substantiate the summary with reasons for your analysis.
Next, identify how the counselor may have been in violation of the ACA Code of Ethics. Give the number and definitions of specific violations and compare these violations to the APA ethical standards.
In relation to these specific violations, describe the similarities or differences in the ACA and APA ethical codes.
Finally, select an ethical decision-making model from those in your readings and apply the model to a minimum of one ethical dilemma you identified in the course scenario. (ATTACHED)
Your paper should be at least 4 pages long, not counting the title page and the reference page.
A. The RESOLVEDD Method by Jonathan L. Kvanig
See Also: "RESOLVEDD", in Raymond Pfeiffer and Ralph Forsberg, editors, Ethics on
the Job: Cases and Strategies (Third Edition, Wadsworth, 2004).
[NOTE: This has been slightly modified]
1. R Review the facts
Review history, background and details of case
o What are the details?
o What is the background?
2. E Estimate (specify) the conflict or problem present in the case, i.e., what is at issue or at stake.
3. S List main possible solutions to the case.
4. O State important and probable outcomes or consequences of each solution.
o What will happen?
o What is likely to happen?
o What might happen?
L Describe likely impact of each main solution on people's lives, and on the interests and concerns of entities (i.e., institutions, organizations, companies, governments and states), as well as nonhumans and the environment.
o Who will be benefited?
o Who will be harmed?
o Who else will be impacted and how?
6. V Explain the values upheld and those infringed by each main solution.
o Refer to relevant moral principles: honesty, harm, fidelity, autonomy, confidentiality, lawfulness, equal consideration of interests;
o Characterize salient moral rights: knowledge, privacy, life, free expression, due process, safety, property, profitability;
o Include the consideration of the interests and rights of future generations.
7. E Evaluate each main solution in terms of outcomes, likely impact and values upheld or infringed.
8. D Decide which solution is best, state it, clarify its details, and justify it.
9. D Defend the decision against objections to its main weaknesses.
Attachment:- course_case_study.rar