Random-walk hypothesis with no binding borrowing constraint


Suppose that Parliament passes a law to permanently cut taxes starting the next year. Assuming that consumers are not Ricardian, when would consumers adjust their consumption spending according to:

a. The Keynesian consumption function?

b. The Fisher two-period model with binding borrowing constraints?

c. The random-walk hypothesis (the permanent-income hypothesis with rational expectations) with no binding borrowing constraint?

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Microeconomics: Random-walk hypothesis with no binding borrowing constraint
Reference No:- TGS054614

Expected delivery within 24 Hours