Provide a philosophical critique of the current model and


Energy Demand Analysis and Forecasting

The following model (in Box 1) was developed by Company X in 2006 to inform the relationship between electricity consumption, gross state product (GSP), and electricity price for New South Wales. Data for the period 1980-2005 was used to develop this model.

Box 1 Electricity demand model for New South Wales

Dependent Variable: LOG(Electricity Consumption)

Method: Least Squares

 

 

 

 

Sample: 1980 2005

 

 

 

 

Included observations: 26

 

 

 

 

Variable

Coefficient

Std. Error

t-Statistic

Prob.

Constant

1.091484

0.553990

-7.067906

0.0000

LOG(GSP)

0.795888

0.032037

41.35211

0.0000

LOG(Electricity Price)

-0.049489

0.069514

-9.682326

0.0000

R-squared

0.995855

Mean dependent variance

11.06420

Adjusted R-squared

0.994640

S.D. dependent variance

0.121828

S.E. of regression

0.008919

Akaike info criterion

 

-6.433828

Sum squared residual

0.001034

Schwarz criterion

 

-6.288968

Log likelihood

54.45359

Hannan-Quinn criterion

-6.426410

F-statistic

1392.803

Durbin-Watson stat

 

1.796665

Prob(F-statistic)

0.000000

 

 

 

 

This model has been used by:

i. policy makers and regulators in the government, to develop policies that targeting change in electricity demand pattern, and

ii. utility planners and market operators, to plan for future electricity demand.

The drastic changes in socio-economic conditions and government policies over the recent years prompt Company X to revise the "current" model. In view of the renowned UTS graduates, you are approached by this company to update the model.

With curiosity, your first attempt is to assess the model's predictive performance. This is done by using the "current" model (Box 1), and data on exogenous variables published by the Australian Bureau of Statistics, to develop estimates for backcast, ex-post simulation, and ex-post forecast. These estimates are then compared against actual electricity consumption, as shown in the figure in Annex 1. You also calculate the deviation between the estimated demand trend and actual consumption, in terms of Root Mean Square Percentage Error (RMSPE), and Theil Inequality Coefficients - also shown in the figure in Annex 1. You have noticed that there is a substantial deviation between electricity demand estimates and actual electricity consumption over the two time periods: i) prior to 1980, and ii) post-2005.

TASKS

1. Provide a philosophical critique of the "current" model. (no more than two dot points with each dot point no more than five lines)

2. Comment on the robustness of the "current" model in terms of its applications for:

- policy makers and regulators, and
- utility planners and market operators.
(no more than five lines for each of the above two dot points)

3. Consider the following statement: The applied econometrician soon discovers from experience that a useful model is not one that is true or realistic but one that is parsimonious, plausible and informative.

Based on your answers in Tasks 1 and 2, comment on the relevance of this statement in the context of updating the model for Company X. (no more than five lines for each dot point - parsimonious, plausible and informative)

Annex 1 Electricity consumption trends in New South Wales (TWh)

2239_figure.png

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Econometrics: Provide a philosophical critique of the current model and
Reference No:- TGS01471678

Now Priced at $25 (50% Discount)

Recommended (96%)

Rated (4.8/5)