Projects and the tax-refund alternative


The state of Glottomora has $100 million remaining in its budget for the current year. One alternative is to give Glottomorans a one-time tax rebate. Alternatively, two proposals have been made for state expenditures of these funds.

The first proposed project is to invest in a new power plant, costing $100 million and having an expected useful life of 20 years. Projected benefits accruing from this project are as follows:

Years 1-5 = $0 benefits per year

Years 6-20 = $20million benefits per year

The second alternative is to undertake a job retraining program, also costing $100 million and generating the following benefits:

Years 1-5 = $20 million

Years 6-10 = $14 million

Years 11-20 = $4 million

The state Power Department argues that a 5% discount factor should be used in evaluating the projects, because that is the government's borrowing rate. The HR department suggests using a 12% rate, because that more nearly equals society's true opportunity rate.

Question: Make a choice between the projects and the tax-refund alternative. Why did you choose the alternative you did?

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Finance Basics: Projects and the tax-refund alternative
Reference No:- TGS041112

Expected delivery within 24 Hours