--%>

Problem regarding confidence intervals


Assignment task:

Javier

A confidence interval (CI) represents a range of values that likely contains the true population parameter, such as a mean or proportion. It measures how uncertain a sample estimate is and assists in the definition of the degree to which the estimate is precise. Take an example where a clinical trial has concluded that a new therapy is beneficial to 65 per cent of patients with a 95 per cent confidence interval of 58 per cent to 72 per cent. In that case, this means we can be 95% confident that the true rate of improvement lies within that interval (Julious, 2023). The width of this range is critical. Lower CI suggests greater accuracy of the data, usually based on a bigger sample size or a smaller difference in the data. Conversely, when CI is broader, it would mean that there is more uncertainty, and probably additional information is required.

Confidence intervals provide context that a simple point estimate cannot. Suppose that two independent studies test the same intervention. Study A gives a 40 percent decrease in the pain of patients with a 35 percent to 45 percent interval, whereas Study B has the same 40 percent decrease in pain in the patients, but its confidence interval is 20 percent to 60 percent. The precision is definitely not the same, despite the point estimates being the same. Study A's results are more trustworthy due to their narrow interval, whereas Study B's wide interval highlights the inconsistency of the results (Zhang, 2022). For Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) professionals who rely on accurate evidence to make informed decisions, understanding this difference is essential. Inaccurate data can result in the wrong intervention or a poor intervention.

In addition, confidence intervals assist in removing the gap existing between the statistical significance and clinical significance. A result may achieve statistical significance (e.g., p < 0.05), but that does not guarantee it is meaningful in practice. Consider a blood pressure drug that reduces systolic pressure to an average of 5 mmHg, with a CI of 2 to 8 mmHg. The lower limit of 2 mmHg may not be of clinical significance, particularly where definite standards interpret a five mmHg change in the measure to represent positive change. But in case of CI ranges between 8 and 15 mmHg, the minimal change would make a considerable clinical improvement, which would affect not only the course of treatment, but also the advice given to patients.

The confidence intervals also play an essential role where findings in various research studies are to be compared, such as during meta-analysis. When the intervals overlap, it usually implies that there is consistency in the outcomes of the study, and when the intervals do not overlap, there may be a significant difference. For example, three studies assessing medication adherence report adherence rates of 70% (CI: 65-75%), 68% (CI: 60-76%), and 85% (CI: 80-90%) (Hemming & Taljaard, 2021). The fact that the first two studies resulted in overlapping intervals indicates that there will be more or less adherence patterns, but the third study with the non-overlapping interval could indicate a different population or the effectiveness of the intervention, which must be examined further.

In quality improvement (QI) efforts, CIs provide critical insight into the reliability of measured outcomes. When the hand hygiene compliance rate is given as 80 percent with a 60 to 95 percent confidence interval, it may imply the use of sampling errors or poor observation. When the CI95 is narrow in the measure of quality, the DNP leaders are reassured that there is no chance of making sweeping changes, and on the other hand, broad intervals indicate that caution and additional information are necessary before scaling the interventions.

The knowledge of those concepts directly contributes to DNP Essential II: Organizational and Systems Leadership. Advanced nursing practice involves the nurses being able to judge the quality and accuracy of the evidence shown to them. As a result, confidence intervals can help DNP to evaluate the reliability of research and even estimate the effectiveness of interventions. In addition, they can be used to draw data-based organizational decisions on the appropriate consideration of uncertainty and risk. Need Assignment Help?

References

Hemming, K., & Taljaard, M. (2021). Why is a proper understanding of confidence intervals and statistical significance important? Medical Journal of Australia, 214(3), 116-118.

Zhang, W. (2022). Confidence intervals: Concepts, fallacies, criticisms, solutions, and beyond. Network Biology, 12(3), 97.

Julious, S. A. (2023). Sample sizes for clinical trials. Chapman and Hall/CRC.

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Other Subject: Problem regarding confidence intervals
Reference No:- TGS03466240

Expected delivery within 24 Hours