It is easier to predict technical advances than to predict their public acceptance or rejection for crime control purposes. Some technical possibilities run head-on against concerns for privacy. Click the link below to read the case of Kyllo v. U.S. and discuss the complexity of the decision on whether the thermal imaging of a home constitutes an unreasonable search, a reasonable search, or not a search at all. Do you see a possible constitutional challenge in the use of some other technology for crime control purposes?